The World Economic Forum (WEF) has stirred up controversy with its recent revelation about the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting it served as a trial to gauge the public’s compliance with what they describe as a ‘New World Order.’
This startling admission came to light through a post on the WEF’s “My Carbon” page, where they discuss the concept of 15-minute smart cities. The idea behind these cities is convenience and sustainability, but at what cost?
COVID-19: A Test of Social Responsibility and Compliance
The WEF’s statement bluntly points out that the COVID-19 pandemic was a way to measure public obedience to sweeping regulations. According to their post, global acceptance of measures like social distancing, mask-wearing, and mass vaccinations was seen as a test of “social responsibility.” Billions of people complied, which the WEF claims reflects the strength of collective responsibility. They write:
“COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.”
But what were they really testing? According to critics, it wasn’t just about health—it was about control.
The WEF’s Vision: Obedience Over Freedom
For many, the restrictions during COVID-19 raised questions that went far beyond health concerns. Why were people allowed to shop at large chain stores like Lowe’s or Home Depot, but small businesses and churches were deemed unsafe? How could strip clubs in some states remain open, but people couldn’t buy seeds for their gardens?
These inconsistencies led to growing suspicion that the true goal wasn’t just public health but compliance with a larger, more authoritarian agenda.
The WEF’s message seems to confirm this, implying that in order to achieve a “sustainable” future, societies must become more obedient to the new rules of a global order. This means fewer questions and more blind obedience. Don’t ask why. Don’t challenge the logic. Just comply.
WHAT IF THE CONSTITUTION NO LONGER APPLIED? FREEDOM’S GREATEST HOUR OF DANGER IS NOW
A New Normal or a New World Order?
During the pandemic, many of the rules felt arbitrary and even absurd. The requirement to stand six feet apart, wear masks, and accept mRNA-based vaccines was met with skepticism by some. Critics pointed out that these measures seemed more like tools to test the public’s willingness to obey rather than actual efforts to protect health.
In fact, Dr. Anthony Fauci, one of the leading voices of the pandemic response in the U.S., admitted that the six-foot social distancing guideline wasn’t based on solid science. Yet, millions complied, because the alternative—questioning authority—often meant facing social ostracism, losing jobs, or being labeled a conspiracy theorist.
Exploring the Controversial Concept of the New World Order: Real Threat or Conspiracy Theory?
What the WEF’s Admission Tells Us
Fast forward nearly five years since the pandemic began, and the WEF’s admission raises disturbing questions. Were we really just subjects in a global experiment? According to the WEF, the answer is yes. They were testing how many of us would willingly give up our personal freedoms in exchange for a “new normal.” For those behind the scenes, the results may have been a success.
Depending on your viewpoint, the public either failed the test by complying or passed with flying colors by demonstrating their willingness to accept “unimaginable restrictions” without question.
Restrictions Without Scientific Basis
One of the most concerning aspects of this entire episode is the apparent lack of scientific justification for many of the restrictions imposed during the pandemic. The WEF itself acknowledged that many measures had little to no scientific backing.
This becomes even more alarming when we recall that some of the most influential voices in the pandemic response, including Dr. Fauci, admitted that certain policies, like social distancing, were more about public compliance than public health. This has left many questioning whether the restrictions were ever truly necessary or if they were simply tools to gauge our obedience.
Who Needs Foreign Enemies When We’ve Got Our Own Citizens?
What Does This Mean for the Future?
The WEF’s vision for the future includes the development of 15-minute cities, which are designed to centralize all essential services within a 15-minute walking or biking distance. While the idea of convenience and sustainability sounds appealing on the surface, it’s hard not to wonder whether this is just another form of control. After all, these “smart cities” would require citizens to live by a new set of rules—rules that may not prioritize individual freedoms.
As the WEF continues to push for its vision of a sustainable future, it seems clear that obedience will remain a cornerstone of its agenda. The question is: how far are we willing to go in the name of sustainability? And more importantly, how much freedom are we willing to sacrifice in the process?
The Takeaway: A Test of Will
At the end of the day, the COVID-19 pandemic wasn’t just a health crisis—it was a test of will. The WEF’s recent admission reveals that they were watching closely to see how compliant people would be in the face of “unimaginable restrictions.” Now that the test is over, the results are clear: many of us complied, and that may be exactly what they were hoping for.
The challenge moving forward is whether we continue down this path of obedience or start questioning the authority behind the restrictions. As the WEF looks to the future, it’s up to the public to decide whether they want to follow along or stand up for their freedoms.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive. Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
