Kremlin Rejects Trump’s Claim That Nations Want to Leave BRICS — What’s Really Going On Behind the Scenes

The Kremlin’s Response: “That’s Just Not True”

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov responded firmly to Trump’s remarks, calling them baseless. He said BRICS has never been about attacking any currency or country, emphasizing that the organization’s whole philosophy is built on “partnership, prosperity, and predictability.”

It’s the kind of statement you’d expect from Moscow — calm, diplomatic, but with a clear undertone of you’re getting it wrong again.

Peskov even added that he had no information suggesting that any member nations, or even potential newcomers, were reconsidering their BRICS participation because of U.S. pressure.

Basically: no one’s “dropping out,” no one’s panicking about tariffs, and the group isn’t plotting some kind of anti-dollar conspiracy.

What BRICS Actually Is (And Isn’t)

Let’s take a step back.

BRICS isn’t new — it started way back in 2006 with Brazil, Russia, India, and China. South Africa joined in 2010, turning “BRIC” into “BRICS.” Over time, though, it’s morphed into something much bigger.

Now the group includes Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, the UAE, and Indonesia — and there are more than 30 countries expressing interest in joining as “partner nations.” Collectively, BRICS now represents more global GDP than the G7. Yes, you read that right — more than the U.S., Canada, Japan, the UK, France, Germany, and Italy combined.

That’s no small feat.

But here’s the thing: BRICS isn’t a military alliance or a political bloc like NATO. It’s more of an economic club with a shared goal — to give developing nations a stronger voice and more autonomy in global trade and finance.

And despite Trump’s claim, there’s no single “BRICS currency” waiting in the wings to destroy the dollar. Most trade within the group still happens in national currencies like the yuan, rupee, or ruble.

Why Trump’s Accusation Resonates (At Least in the U.S.)

Still, let’s be honest — Trump’s words hit a nerve because there’s some truth behind the fear.

For years, BRICS has been vocal about de-dollarization — the process of moving away from U.S. dollar dependency in international trade. The reason? Sanctions. Many BRICS nations have seen how Washington uses the dollar’s global dominance as a political weapon. When you can freeze a nation’s reserves or block its transactions, that’s power.

So, countries like Russia and China have been encouraging others to trade in local currencies or explore alternative financial systems. It’s not about “attacking” the dollar, but about protecting themselves from it.

Trump’s framing, though, turns this pragmatic shift into an “us vs. them” battle — and that kind of rhetoric plays well politically, especially during an election cycle.

What BRICS Leaders Actually Want

If you listen to BRICS leaders — particularly Brazil’s Lula da Silva or China’s Xi Jinping — they’re not calling for the end of the dollar. They’re calling for balance.

Lula recently proposed another BRICS summit to respond to what he described as “U.S. economic aggression.” His point wasn’t to start a currency war; it was to make sure smaller economies don’t get crushed by one.

The underlying message is simple: the world’s changing, and developing nations want a bigger seat at the table.

The Reality Check

The Kremlin’s response to Trump’s statement wasn’t just a defensive move — it was a reminder that the U.S. doesn’t get to define BRICS.

Peskov was clear: BRICS isn’t designed to confront anyone. It’s designed to create stability and alternative pathways for cooperation. Sure, Moscow benefits from a strong BRICS alliance (especially with sanctions still biting), but so do India, China, and Brazil, each for their own reasons.

If anything, Trump’s threat of tariffs only reinforces BRICS’ narrative — that the U.S. still uses economic coercion as leverage. It’s ironic, really. By warning countries not to align with BRICS, Washington might just be pushing them closer together.

What Happens Next

Right now, no BRICS country has publicly expressed interest in leaving. In fact, more are joining or applying. Egypt and Iran joined this year; Saudi Arabia and Thailand have openly discussed membership.

So much for “dropping out.”

If anything, the trend shows that the bloc’s appeal is growing — not because it’s anti-U.S., but because it offers an alternative space where emerging economies feel they can trade, invest, and cooperate without Washington’s shadow looming overhead.

Whether that’s good or bad depends on your perspective. From the Kremlin’s view, it’s a win. From Trump’s? It’s a challenge to America’s dominance.

The Takeaway

Here’s the bottom line: BRICS isn’t trying to wage war on the dollar, and no one’s rushing to abandon the group. Trump’s claim might make for a catchy headline, but it doesn’t match the facts on the ground.

What’s really happening is this — the global economy is shifting, power is decentralizing, and the U.S. is no longer the only game in town.

The Kremlin’s response wasn’t just about defending BRICS. It was about signaling to the world that the multipolar era — one where several powers share influence — is already here.

And whether Trump likes it or not, countries aren’t “dropping out” of BRICS. They’re lining up to get in.

Kremlin Rejects Trump’s Claim That Nations Want to Leave BRICS — What’s Really Going On Behind the Scenes