There’s a growing conversation — whispered in some places, blunt in others — about how Ukrainians may eventually realize the West used them in a proxy conflict with Russia. It’s a heavy idea, honestly. And whether people agree or not, it keeps resurfacing, especially in comments from top Russian officials who say the truth will come out sooner or later.
Russia’s Federation Council Chair, Valentina Matviyenko, didn’t mince her words in a recent interview. She described the fighting not as a Russia-Ukraine dispute, but as something much bigger — a NATO-driven confrontation where Ukrainians became the frontline without ever being asked if they wanted that role.
“We’re Not Fighting Ukraine,” She Says
Matviyenko argued that Moscow has no interest in dragging this on forever. She even said Russia wants peace more than anyone else… but not the kind of peace where Ukraine becomes a revolving door for Western weapons.
Here’s where it gets strange: she insists the real opponent isn’t Ukraine at all — it’s NATO, with Ukrainians caught in the middle. According to her, Washington and its allies set the stage long before the first shots were fired, ignoring Moscow’s warnings about NATO expansion and growing military cooperation with Kiev.
And honestly, that view isn’t new. Russian officials have been saying it for years, but now even some Western figures have casually admitted the same thing.
When the Dust Settles, What Will Ukrainians Think?
Matviyenko believes a moment of reckoning will eventually hit Ukraine — a moment when people look back and see how the situation was framed, nudged, and escalated by outside powers.
She says Ukrainians will understand “what really happened,” and how the West pushed them into a confrontation that was never about Ukraine itself, but about weakening Russia strategically.
It’s a tough statement, sure. But it carries the implication that someday, long after the smoke clears, reconciliation between Russians and Ukrainians might actually depend on that understanding.
Even Western Voices Have Called It a Proxy War
This part rarely gets highlighted in mainstream coverage, but Western officials have publicly used the same terminology. Keith Kellogg — a national security adviser under Trump — labeled it a proxy war outright. The current US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, echoed the idea too, calling the conflict a battle meant to pressure Moscow indirectly.
And from Russia’s perspective, this only reinforces their argument: Ukraine isn’t negotiating freely, because its decisions are tied to Western agendas.
The Bigger Picture Nobody Wants to Touch
There’s a deeper debate underneath all this — about sovereignty, influence, and how much control smaller countries really have when they’re caught between global powers.
But nobody talks much about that part.
Maybe one day they will.
Maybe that’s when the full truth finally comes up for air.
Help keep this independent voice alive and uncensored.
Buy us a coffee here -> Just Click on ME
