In a paradigm shift for global food consumption, lab-grown meat is envisioned to dominate the market, potentially constituting 80 percent or more of the world’s meat intake. However, this breakthrough, heralded as a solution to environmental issues and hunger crises, is fraught with complexities that could redefine how humans eat.
Dutch investigative journalist Elze van Hamelen, in conversation with Catherine Austin Fitts on “The Solari Report,” sheds light on the rising tide of synthetic foods manufactured by the biotech industry. This transition, however, raises critical concerns about its impact on human health.
The Dutch government, among other entities, heavily invests in lab-grown meat, employing technologies akin to pharmaceutical development. Yet, despite the promises, the production of faux meat faces daunting technological hurdles, rendering it exorbitantly expensive, susceptible to microbial contamination, and challenging to produce on a large scale.
Contrary to claims advocating for the environment and health benefits, the primary motivation behind synthetic meats appears to be the gradual phasing out of traditional farmers and ranchers. These replacements come in the form of highly processed food products, controlled through patents, thereby handing over control of the food supply to governmental and corporate entities.
Van Hamelen delves into the process of creating lab-grown meat, where cell lines derived from living organisms are manipulated to accelerate consistent growth. However, the ambiguity surrounding the specific cell lines used in biotech processes raises ethical concerns, as cells that multiply rapidly– reminiscent of cancers or fetuses– become the cornerstone for lab-grown meats.
Ordinarily, cells thrive within the body’s structural environment. However, in lab settings, these cell lines grow in a simulated medium, attempting to mimic the complexities of human blood. Shockingly, this medium often relies on fetal bovine serum (FBS), contradicting claims that lab-grown meats are animal-free. The harvesting process of FBS, obtained from living calf fetuses, raises ethical and moral questions.
Moreover, the production process demands precision fermentation and genetically engineered microbes to replicate synthetic “blood,” incorporating artificial hormones and essential nutrients. This intricate process results in staggering production costs, estimated at over $20,000 per kilogram when using FBS-free mediums. Efforts to reduce costs remain uncertain, casting doubt on claims of an impending 90 percent cost reduction, as suggested by some reports.
The challenge of maintaining sterility in the fermentation process is pivotal, with contamination risks looming at a scale as minute as 2 parts per billion. Failure to control contamination results in bacterial proliferation, compromising the intended cell culture and rendering the product unusable.
The necessity for sterile conditions akin to pharmaceutical-grade facilities escalates expenses, making the feasibility of lab-grown meat reaching the market a dubious prospect. The vulnerability to contamination from bacteria and viruses, coupled with the absence of a natural immune system within the cultured cells, exacerbates these challenges.
Reports from insiders in the industry highlight recurring setbacks in production due to contamination, leading to the disposal of entire batches. Despite attempts at refinement, lab-grown meat’s path to commercial viability remains uncertain, facing considerable technological obstacles and unpredictable outcomes.
Furthermore, the push towards synthetic foods has implications for traditional farming communities, especially in the Netherlands. Policies curbing nitrogen emissions in farming areas threaten the livelihoods of generational farmers, paving the way for corporate and governmental entities to seize agricultural land. This shift could potentially limit consumer choices, coercing reliance on synthetic alternatives.
The implications of synthetic foods extend beyond human consumption, targeting animal feed and pet foods, steering toward a tightly controlled food system that replaces traditional farming with synthetic alternatives.
In response to this growing challenge, supporting small-scale farmers and advocating for legislative measures, such as the PRIME Act, becomes crucial. The PRIME Act seeks to allow smaller slaughterhouses to sell meat without an on-site inspector, ensuring safty through periodic USDA inspections while making meat more accessible and affordable.
The essence of food safety and security lies in a decentralized food system, connecting communities with local farmers committed to sustainable and genuine food production. Redirecting support from corporate chains to local farmers emerges as a key strategy in preserving real food sources and fostering resilient communities.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Chris Wick News needs reader support to survive and thrive.
Please do not give your hard-earned money to sites or channels that copy/paste our intellectual property. We spend countless hours vetting, researching, and writing. Thank you. Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)
Contribute to Chris Wick News via GoGetFunding