The allure of receiving “free money” from the government and the perpetuation of the belief that debts pose no real issue are prevalent. Governments, like individuals, can choose to spend extravagantly or cautiously. Citizens benefit from the apparent generosity of a spendthrift government, perceiving it as a source of “free money.”
However, Niccolo Machiavelli, in his timeless work “The Prince” from 1516, shed light on the fallacy of “free money.” He outlined the dichotomy between leaders who spend liberally to maintain a positive image and those labeled as frugal or mean. Machiavelli cautioned that the pursuit of a reputation for lavish spending exhausts state funds, leading to increased taxation to sustain such generosity.
This cycle unveils the irony of a seemingly generous government burdening its people to support its spending habits. Surprisingly, it’s the apparently tight-fisted leader or state that is genuinely generous, imposing lighter financial strains on its citizens.
Machiavelli argued that both taxes and inflation, stemming from excessive spending, essentially rob the populace. Additionally, the perception of state generosity asymmetrically distributes benefits and drawbacks among the population.
In Machiavelli’s wisdom, a leader wise in economic matters shouldn’t fear being labeled as frugal. Such a leader, through economic prudence, maintains sufficient revenue without burdening the populace. This approach allows for a fairer distribution of resources amung the citizens, contrasting with the detrimental effects of excessive spending.
The consequences of profligate spending are dire, as resources are squandered, and the positive reputation derived from such actions swiftly diminishes, much like financial solvency. THe initial appeal of recieving “free money” from the state fades when confronted with the harsh realities: diminishing purchasing power due to inflation, escalating taxes and fees, and the daunting interest payments on soaring state debts.
Machiavelli warned against the rapid erosion caused by excessive generosity, leading either to impoverishment or disdain, or worse, a transition to rapacity in the pursuit of wealth preservation. Therefore, it’s wiser for a leader to bear the stigma of frugality than to be branded as rapacious due to a pursuit of a generous image.
The prevailing myth that debts pose no threat perpetuates the belief that continual economic growth will effortlessly absolve debts. However, this notion hinges on borrowing and spending that outpace actual economic growth, resulting in what is termed diminishing returns. The constant need to fuel the illusion of growth with mounting debt is akin to a self-consuming cycle.
The enthusiasm for a benevolent government dwindles when the populace realizes the eventual cost they must bear. Ultimately, everyone pays the price for the largesse of a spendthrift state, whether directly or indirectly.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Chris Wick News needs your support to survive.
