In a startling move, Democrats are set to introduce a contentious law, colloquially known as the ‘PEt Tax,’ compelling pet owners to pay substantial fees for keeping their healthy pets alive. This move is part of the WEF’s Net Zero agenda, aiming to reduce the environmental impact of pets.
” WEF’s Call for Action”
Last year, the World Economic Forum (WEF) called upon governments globally to cull millions of pets to decrease their “carbon pawprint” resulting from meat consumption. Now, Democrats are translating this call into action with bill HB24-1163, proposing a ‘Pet Animal Registration System’ that carries exorbitant fees.
” Critics Slam Expensive Registration System”
Critics argue that the proposed system, operating under the ‘Pet Animal Registration Act,’ mandates pet owners to register their animals in a state-run program, burdening them with what many deem excessive and unnecessary fees. The intention behind these fees is to dissuade pet ownership, coercing owners to euthanize their pets to avoid the imposed tax.
” Financial Impact on Pet Owners”
The fee structure under the proposed system varies, with costs ranging from $8.50 for pets with designated caregivers to a staggering $25 for pets without a caregiver. This can significantly impact multi-pet households, breeders, and sellers, potentially imposing substantial financial strain.
” Wide-Ranging Consequences for Various Pets”
The proposed fees aren’t limited to traditional pets like dogs and cats; they encompass a broad spectrum, including reptiles, amphibians, fish, and even invertebrates. This leaves no pet owner untouched, creating a potential financial burden for families with diverse pet collections.
” Department of Agriculture’s Role and Penalties”
The Department of Agriculture is tasked with creating and managing the online registration system, imposing stiff penalties for non-compliance, with fines of up to $100 per unregistered animal. This stringent approach raises concerns about government intrusion into private lives and the true motives behind the bill.
” Pet Tax Opponents Prepare for Battle”
Opponents of the bill argue that it is more about revenue collection than genuine concern for animal welfare. With a hearing scheduled for February 22 at the State Capitol, a battle is looming as activists strive to prevent what they see as an unjust ‘pet tax.’
” Government Surveillance Concerns”
By implementing this ‘pet tax,’ Colorado is establishing a precedent that suggests animal companionship is a luxury accessible only to those willing to submit their furry friends to government surveillance. The bill’s intent to connect pets with owners during emergencies is overshadowed by skepticism about the chosen method– taxation.
In summary, the proposed ‘Pet Tax’ has ignited controversy, with critics decrying it as an infringement on personal freedoms and an attempt to generate revenue under the guise of animal welfare. As the hearing approaches, both supporters and opponents gear up for a pivotal debate that could reshape the landscape of pet ownership.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Chris Wick News needs reader support to survive and thrive.
We are a privately owned website funded solely by donations from our readers, Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)
