In the wake of the pandemic, the ubiquitous stickers enforcing “Six Feet of Distance” have become a relic of an uncertain past. In this article, we delve into the enigma surrounding the origins of this widely embraced but scientifically dubious rule that dictated social interactions for an extended period. As we uncover the questionable roots, we’ll explore the consequences it wrought and the imperative need for accountability.
The Unexplained Genesis
Despite its profound impact on society, the genesis of the six-foot distancing rule remains shrouded in mystery. Even Anthony Fauci, a key figure in the pandemic response, admitted to being in the dark about its origins during U.S. House hearings. This revelation is particularly astonishing given that the rule influenced every facet of human interaction for years.
Probing the Unknown
The NEw York Times, in March 2021, attempted to shed light on this puzzling mandate. Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, expressed skepticism, stating, “It’s almost like it was pulled out of thin air.” Linsey Marr, an expert on viral transmission at Virginia Tech University, echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the lack of sensibility in the prescribed distance.
Scientific Ambiguity and Contradictions
A significant revelation came from a study published in the journal Clinical and Infectious Diseases in March 2021, comparing six feet and and three feet of distance. Astonishingly, the study found no statistically significant difference in infection rates. The conclusion suggested that lower physical distancing requirements, coupled with masking mandates, were safe for schools. However, the prescribed six feet persisted, despite the scientific findings.
Impacts on Daily Life
The aftermath of the enforced distancing rule was far-reaching. Schools faced delays in reopening, airports witnessed crowded spaces, and everyday activities like weddings and funerals were disrupted. The article delves into the impracticality and expense of certain mandates, such as the widespread use of Plexiglas, which ironically hindered ventilation and possibly worsened the spread of pathogens.
Accountability: The Need of the Hour
As the rule appears to have stemmed from arbitrary decisions rather than scientific evidence, questions of accountability arise. The article advocates for a thorough investigation into the origins of not only the six feet rule but all pandemic protocols issued during the period. Individuals in leadership positions, including heads of the CDC, should provide insights or name those who may have initiated such measures.
Beyond Borders: A GLobal Trauma
Drawing parallels with the Chinese Communist Party’s response to SARS-1 in 2003, the article suggests that the entire paradigm of pandemic response may have been influenced by political control tactics. This global trauma, it argues, has left a lasting impact on various aspects of life, from political upheaval to workforce shortages.
The Call for Prolonged Investigations
In conclusion, the article emphasizes the necessity for prolonged investigations into the origins of pandemic protocols. It contends that understanding the roots of seemingly arbitrary decisions, starting with the six feet rule, is crucial for addressing the broader consequences of the pandemic response. The search for accountability should not be a fleeting endeavor but a sustained effort lasting at least 5– 10 years.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Chris Wick News needs your support to survive.
