A Buggy Solution to the Crisis
In a move that no one saw coming (except perhaps a few imaginative sci-fi writers), supermarkets are now stocking up on “edible insects” to help families navigate the turbulent waters of the “cost of living crisis” and the impending “global food shortage.” According to reports, this quirky culinary shift is designed to ensure our survival by making us all a little more bug-friendly.
Bill Gates and The Insect Brigade
Bill Gates, joined by his cronies at the World Economic Forum, has long been the harbinger of our insect-eating future. According to them, our traditional dietary staples—like red meat and chicken—are far too “carbon-intensive” to align with the lofty ideals of Agenda 2030 and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Thus, in a bizarre twist of fate, crickets and mealworms are being positioned as the new steak and chicken breast.
The Insect Invasion in European Supermarkets
The global elite have managed to persuade major European supermarket chains, including the ever-popular ALDI, to start selling insects to the masses. Yes, you read that right. ALDI, the same place where you once bought your affordable wine and weekly groceries, is now encouraging you to pick up a packet of crunchy critters to go with your Chardonnay.
The Unseen Buggy Agenda in the U.S.
Across the pond, things are equally buggy. The Democrats, in their infinite wisdom, have signed a World Economic Forum (WEF) treaty that conveniently allows U.S. food companies to sneak bugs and insects into popular foods without bothering to inform the unsuspecting public. It’s almost as if they think what you don’t know can’t hurt you—or at least, it won’t make you squirm.
Minnesota’s Buggy Legislative Drama
In the state of Minnesota, a riveting drama unfolded in the Senate. Senate Democrats blocked an amendment that would have required clear labeling of foods containing bugs. This amendment, part of the omnibus agriculture policy bill known as S.F. 4225, was put forth by Sen. Torrey Westrom, R-Alexandria, who argued passionately that consumers have the right to know if they are about to chow down on cricket flour or lab-grown meat.
The Debate Over Consumer Knowledge
Sen. Aric Putnam, D-St. Cloud, while agreeing in principle that “consumers should know what they are consuming,” opposed the amendment. He labeled it a “future problem,” implying that the financial implications of such labeling requirements needed thorough examination before any legislative action could be taken. Because who cares about transparency when there’s a budget to worry about?
Conclusion: Embrace the Crunch
So, here we are, standing at the precipice of a new culinary era where bugs are no longer the stuff of nightmares but of nightly dinners. Supermarkets are rolling out the red carpet for our six-legged saviors, and lawmakers are busy debating whether or not to let us in on the secret. It seems the future of food is crunchy, and whether we like it or not, we might as well embrace it. Bon appétit!
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive. Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
