Is Covert Vaccination Ethical? Australian Government’s Directive Raises Concerns

Date:

Share This:

Ever heard of a surprise party where the guest of honor is, well, unaware they’re the guest? Welcome to the latest twist in healthcare courtesy of the Australian government, where vaccines are apparently slipping into the picture while your peacefully dozing off for your medical check-up. Move over, magician – doctors are now mastering the art of vaccine prestidigitation.

The Australian government recently issued a contentious notice directing medical practitioners to administer vaccines to patients who are unwilling while they are sedated or under anesthesia for unrelated medical procedures.

Government’s Unconventional Approach
Despite Australia being among the world’s most vaccinated nations, the government remains steadfast in its pursuit of achieving a 100% vaccination rate, irrespective of the consent of those undergoing vaccination.

Revelation in the Medical Community
Official advice from the Australian government to doctors echoes intelligence reports from nations associated with the World Economic Forum (WEF). Instances in countries like Canada hint at patients being vaccinated without their explicit knowledge or consent during surgical procedures.

Discrepancies in Vaccine Distribution
In an intriguing turn of events, Pfizer, a key player in vaccine distribution, made a startling admission in Australia. It was disclosed that the general public received different vaccine variants compared to the ones administered to Pfizer employees.

Pfizer’s Confidential Batch
During a Senate hearing, a Pfizer spokesperson acknowledged the existence of a distinct “special batch” of COVID-19 vaccine specifically designated for internal use among company employees. This particular batch differed significantly from the vaccine distributed to the wider population.

Interrogation and Acknowledgment
Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts led a rigorous inquiry into Pfizer Australia’s practices, directing pointed questions to Dr. Krishan Thiru, the Country Medical Director, and Dr. Brian Hewitt, the Head of Regulatory Sciences. This interrogation eventually led to Dr. Thiru admitting that Pfizer employees were indeed not administered the regular vaccine.

The unfolding events surrounding the Australian government’s directive and Pfizer’s admission have sparked significant debate and raised ethical concerns within the medical community and the public at large.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Chris Wick News needs reader support to survive and thrive. 

We are a privately owned website funded solely by donations from our readers, Every dollar helps. Contributions help keep the site active and help support the author (and his medical bills)

Please Contribute via  GoGetFunding

Share This:

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Fluoride is Poison: Look into the History of It

Fluoride – a word that conjures images of sparkling...

CDC Cover-Up: The Hidden Dangers of COVID-19 Vaccines Exposed

In a revelation former CDC director Dr. Robert Redfield...

Fauci Aide Admits to Deleting ‘Smoking Gun’ Emails to Protect Fauci from Legal Consequences

Congressional Hearing Reveals Allegations Against Fauci's Former Aide A congressional...