Experiment Tests New Drug with Potential to Cure Cancer: Because Who Needs Hope?
The freedom of speech and alternative media face challenges from powerful entities. Chris Wick News relies on reader support to endure. Please Donate, It’s quick, secure, and easy. https://gogetfunding.com/realnewscast/
In a world filled with sunshine, rainbows, and puppies, a group of scientists has decided to test a new drug that might, yes MIGHT, cure cancer. Because really, who needs hope when we can dwell in the darkness of uncertainty?
The groundbreaking study, conducted by genius scientists who clearly have nothing better to do, aims to bring about an end to the misery and despair that is cancer. But why, oh why, would anyone want to get rid of such an exhilarating disease? After all, what’s life without a good dose of suffering?
For decades, society has been brainwashed into thinking that finding a cure for cancer would be a monumental achievement. Who cares about eradicating one of the most devastating diseases known to mankind when we can simply reap the financial benefits from expensive treatments and experimental drugs? Kudos to these researchers for daring to stray from the path of greed.
Now, let’s address some of the most common questions that have been haunting humanity since this outrageous experiment was announced:
Q1: What if this drug actually works? Won’t it save millions of lives?
A1: Oh sure, millions of lives might be saved. But what about all the money we’ll lose? Imagine the millions of pharmaceutical industry professionals who would be forced to find other means of employment. It’s incredibly selfish of these researchers to overlook the livelihood of so many hard-working individuals.
Q2: Isn’t it a good thing to eliminate suffering caused by cancer?
A2: Absolutely not! Who would we be without our suffering? Cancer keeps us humble, it reminds us that life is unfair and painful. If everyone was healthy and happy, how would we appreciate the little things, like getting out of bed in the morning or paying exorbitant medical bills?
Q3: But what about the families and loved ones affected by cancer?
A3: Have some perspective, would you? A little suffering builds character. Plus, think of all the reality TV shows we’ll lose if cancer suddenly disappears – no more moments of tearful goodbyes or dramatic reunions. Cancer is a ratings goldmine, and those sobbing families should be grateful for playing their part in entertaining us.
Q4: Won’t eliminating cancer improve overall life expectancy?
A4: Yes, it probably would. But have you thought about the overcrowding issues? We’d have to find some other calamity to decrease the population, like bringing back the bubonic plague. It’s all about balance, people.
In conclusion, the audacity of these scientists to experiment with a drug that could potentially cure cancer is nothing short of outrageous. Who needs hope, progress, or a chance at a better future when we can bask in the glory of suffering and despair? Society should be thankful for the cancer industry, its job security, and the endless tears it evokes.