The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) faces mounting scrutiny over its role in a contentious study cited by the Trudeau government to justify COVID restrictions, including the implementation of vaccine passports.
Investigation Initiated Following Fisman’s COVID Study
The House of Commons has initiated an inquiry into the CIHR’s involvement following a study conducted by David Fisman. Titled “Impact of population mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated subpopulations on infectious disease dynamics: implications for SARS-CoV-2 transmission,” the study has sparked controversy.
Allegations and Inquiry
A Conservative Member of Parliament has filed an order paper question directed at the CIHR, seeking clarification on various aspects of Fisman’s study. Of particular concern are allegations questioning the validity of the study, which was referenced by Liberal members in the House of Commons to support measures such as vaccine passports.
Key Findings Under Scrutiny
Fisman’s study asserted that the risk of COVID infection was significantly higher among unvaccinated individuals compared to vaccinated individuals across all scenarios of population mixing. However, these findings have now come under intense scrutiny, prompting questions about the integrity of the research.
Inquiry Demands Answers
The CIHR has been given a 45-day window to provide detailed responses to queries regarding the study’s funding, qualifications and identities of peer reviewers, potential conflicts of interest, and any involvement or communication with the federal government during the application review process or subsequent media outreach.
Unveiling Potential Conflicts of Interest
Of particular interest are the conflicts of interest declared by the grant applicants at the time of funding. This aspect seeks to shed light on any possible biases that may have influenced the study’s outcomes or interpretation.
Transparency in Peer Review Process
Additionally, inquiries demand transparency regarding the qualifications and identities of the peer reviewers involved in assessing the study. Such information is crucial for evaluating the credibility and impartiality of the review process.
Government Involvement Scrutinized
Questions have also been raised about any potential involvement or communication between the federal government and the CIHR regarding the study. Understanding the extent of government influence or engagement is essential for ensuring the independence and integrity of scientific research.
Public Concerns and Accountability
The inquiry underscores the importance of accountability and transparency in scientific research, especially when findings are utilized to inform public health policies. Addressing concerns raised by lawmakers and the public is vital for upholding trust in the integrity of research institutions and government decision-making processes.
Conclusion
As the CIHR faces scrutiny over its involvement in the controversial COVID study, transparency and accountability are paramount. The inquiry initiated by the House of Commons seeks to address concerns regarding the study’s validity, funding, and potential biases, highlighting the importance of rigorous oversight in scientific research and policy formulation.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Chris Wick News needs your support to survive.
