World Economic Forum’s Secret Plan: Four Billion Lives at Risk by 2030

Date:

Share This:

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is secretly colluding with governments around the world to eradicate four billion “useless humans” by the year 2030, according to several top experts.

Leading experts have spoken out against the WEF’s nefarious plans and are warning the public that the WEF’s “Net Zero” goal to eliminate fossil fuels will result in the culling of over four billion people.

According to the information from Blacklistednews.com, the goal of achieving “Net Zero” and ending the utilization of fossil fuels is a key component of the “Agenda 2030” and “Agenda 2050” plans put forth by the UN and WEF. This objective entails a significant reduction in dependence on fossil fuels by 2030, followed by their complete elimination by 2050.

The WEF continues to push its agenda and has been calling for taxpayers worldwide to pay $3.5 trillion per year, which they insist is necessary to fund the noble global power in order to meet the globalist organisation’s “Net Zero” goal of “decarbonizing” the planet.

However, critics argue that “decarbonization” is just a euphemism for the WEF’s anti-human agenda and experts are raising the alarm about what this will actually mean for civilization, which includes the death of over four billion peopel.

Ending the use of fossil fuels, according to Danish statistician Bjørn Lomborg, could result in approximately 50% of the global population dying solely due to starvation.

“4 billion people are dependent on fossil fertilizer for food,” Lomborg notes. “Without, 4 billion will starve to death. “It is time to call out the astoundingly destructive & misanthropic campaigners,” he declared.

The article Lomborg was responding to was by British economist Neil Record in the Telegraph, who argued that the number of people that might die was closer to six billion.

According to Neil Record, if we were to completely cease the use of fossil fuels and go without the natural resources that the world, its economies, and populations rely on, it is highly probable that six billion individuals would perish within a twelve-month period.

Breaking down what would happen in a world without fossil fuels, Record notes that most people would suffer blackouts due to the grid being so seriously compromised, possibly fatally, and they may be widespread and permanent.”

Gas consumers would immediately notice the impact of ceasing coal mining, shutting down oil wells worldwide, and closing gas fields worldwide. Within 10 to 15 days, the UK would be forced to deactivate its gas distribution system due to an inability to sustain pressure.

In turn, the domestic supply would be shut down too– gas would stop flowing, and some 21 million households (74% of the population) would no longer have heating, hot water, and cooking facilities.

Record explains that during times of panic, individuals may resort to using electricity for cooking and heating. However, it is important to note that the UK electricity grid depends on natural gas as its backup energy source. The demand for electricity fluctuates daily based on consumer needs, and while renewable energy is another major supplier, its output is highly variable. As a result, the grid can only be powered effectively when gas fills the majority of the gap between the output of renewables and consumer demand.

So the moment that the main gas distribution system is de-pressurised, the grid-balancing system fails and power cuts ensue.

Electricity demand would have rocketed through the switch to electric space heating, cooking and water-heating, and so it seems very likely that the sudden excess demand would be undeliverable, and therefore that the grid would spiral into uncontrollability resulting in no electricity. This also means there would be no communication systems no mobile phones and no television.

Without power, there will be no running water and no heating and the most vulnerable people will start to die, according to Record. Initially, this will be the elderly in their own homes, then in hospitals when the diesel backup generators run out of fuel. Within the first 25 days new “existential problems emerge for ordinary people in the form of food availability and distribution.” Source

STARVATION BEGINS FROM DAY 25
Day 25– By the twenty-fifth day, diesel and petrol are likely to have run dry, although, Record says that he is probably being generous with the timing here, but what this will mean is that food distribution would fail, and so as most of the population are entirely dependent on bought food they will begin to starve.

Interestingly, it will be only the isolated rural communities, and those who are agriculturally self-sufficient would be relatively unaffected.

On the fiftieth day, according to Record, a significant number of individuals residing in cities would be on the verge of dying due to lack of food. He asserts that there would be a complete breakdown of law and order, as people become increasingly desperate to find ways to stay alive. In this this dire situation, he believes that there would be widespread conflict and and brutal killings occurring.

Without the sanitary conditions that we have due to power, water supply, and sewage flow, we will see a return of Victorian diseases such as cholera and dysentery.

Day 100– money and status will be irrelevant as time passes and just three months after the world stops oil, Neil Record, guesses that around half of the world’s population of aproximately four billion, people would be dead “The first to die would be the urban poor; then the middle and upper classes”

Again, the survivors would be those in rural areas and able to live off local agricultural produce or live off dwindling food stocks.

For fifty-five percent of people in urban areas, it will be almost impossible to access food and safe water as there will be none of the normal distribution routes for food or storage facilities (chillers/freezers) without electricity, and without pumped water, clean water would be unavailable, or close to impossible to access. Source

After an entire year without oil, it is stated that around two billion individuals may have perished due to starvation or freezing. This would leave approximately two billion people alive, but with depleted or spoiled food supplies. Additionally, the breakdown of law and order would result in numerous violent deaths. This information is recorded on Day 365.

“Competition for scarce resources, so elegantly solved by the invention of markets and prices, would be replaced by murder and mayhem”

There is now no going back as the means to reverse the just stop oil experiment would have gone.

The extinction event would have resulted in the loss of societies’ cultures, education, and methods of survival. This would lead to a period of darkness and decline. Record describes this as a frightening possibility but asserts that all the elements of this scenario are backed by evidence. Source

The WEF members have consistently proposed that large-scale decreases in the global human population would aid in the achievement of the organization’s environmental objectives. Dennis Meadows, an esteemed WEF member, has specifically advocated for an astonishing 86 percent reduction in the number of humans.

Meadows who is one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s 1972 pro-depopulation book “The Limits to Growth.” and an honorary member of the Club of Rome as well as a member of the World Economic FOrum. argues that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

Meadow’s book was published over 50 years ago, but his ideology appears to still align with the WEF’s anti-human, depopulation agenda, of today. He argued that “most of the world’s population must be wiped out so that the survivors can “have freedom” and a “high standard of living.”

Only a chosen minority, known as “the survivors,” will have the privilege of belonging to this exclusive group. It is improbable that a vast majority of individuals will have the opportunity to be a part of it. (Once again, it is the familiar story of belonging to an elite club).

ONE WAY OR ANOTHER
Experts who have warned of the dangers associated with stopping oil should not be ignored, it is blatantly obvious that our unelected leaders are not interested in our well-being. Those who have been promised a privileged position in the depopulated world of the future, have many ways they hope to achieve their aims, whether it be through, chemtrails, vaccines, pharma products, toxic subtances in food, water, etc etc, they aim to get us, one way or another and stopping oil is just one more way.

Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Chris Wick News needs your support to survive. 

Please Contribute via  GoGetFunding

Share This:

1 COMMENT

Comments are closed.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

The Dynamic Duo: David Rockefeller and Jeffrey Epstein – Partners in Philanthropy?

In a world where the wealthy dabble in philanthropy...

Frank Biden Spills the Beans: “My Brother Joe Is On His Deathbed”

The Shocking Revelation from Joe Biden's Brother Hold on to...

Cell Phone Data Unmasks Regular Visitor to Trump Shooter’s Home Who Also Has Frequent Flyer Miles at FBI HQ

Investigators have unearthed a mystery man with an uncanny...

Digital IDs: Big Brother’s Next Fashion Trend

Ah, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has outdone themselves...