So, is Biden really recruiting an army of caped climate crusaders or just brewing up a storm in a teacup? The White House’s Climate Corps plan has Republicans rattling their sabers while Democrats wield their green thumbs. Is this the heroic leap into eco-consciousness or a trek down a costly rabbit hole? Let’s dissect the great climate caper.
Republicans are sounding the alarm over the significant use of taxpayer funds by President Joe Biden’s administration in what they term as the “Climate Corps,” prompting them to introduce a countermeasure bill against this initiative.
The proposed $30 billion green agenda by President Biden has sparked concern among House Republicans, who perceive it as a concerning scheme. The centerpiece of Biden’s plan involves training 20,000 young individuals for roles in the clean energy sector, aiming to address environmental concerns, deploy clean energy technologies, promote energy-efficient practices, and combat climate change, as outlined by the White House.
However, this initiative has met staunch criticism from Republicans who have dubbed it a “climate army” and are actively pushing back. Representative Bob Good (R-VA) has taken a decisive step by introducing the “No American CLimate Corps Act,” aiming to counter Biden’s plan. Good strongly cautions against what he perceives as the Biden administration’s radical anti-American energy agenda and its adverse impacts on everyday Americans.
In his statement, Good highlights the strain on family budgets due to high energy prices, criticizing Biden’s focus on deploying what he terms a “climate army.” He contends that this move will escalate regulatory pressures on businesses, exacerbating inflation across the economy.
This sentiment against Biden’s “climate army” is not limited to Good alone. Many voices have expressed concerns, suggesting that this initiative could be a tactic to coerce Americans into supporting policies they perceive as misleading.
Good’s proposed legislation explicitly aims to block federal funds frome being allocated toward the creation of an American Climate Corps or any similar program. This stance reflects a larger conservative perspective that such initiatives could lead to hyperinflation, higher consumer costs, and a diminished energy capacity for the nation.
The genesis of Biden’s Climate Corps program traces back to its announcement on September 20, spurred by left-leaning political figures who urged its establishment through executive action. Notably, senators and representatives aligned with the Democratic and left-wing spectrum joined forces to pressure Biden into signing the executive order. This coordinated effort involved key figures such as Sen. Ed Markey and a coalition of supportive legislators.
Conversely, conservatives in Congress view these initiatives as contributors to hyperinflation, escalating costs for consumers, and a detrimental impact on American energy independence. Good’s one-pager underscores the resemblance of this initiative to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal, which expanded the govenrment durig the Great Depression. It further warns agains the potential financial toll, estimating a $500 billion expense due to climate-related spending linked to bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the CHIPS and Science Act, and the Inflation Acceleration Act.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. Chris Wick News needs your support to survive.
