The UN’s Hunger Games: A Tale of Two Worlds
In 2015, the United Nations (UN) had a bright idea: to eliminate world hunger by 2030 through its Sustainable Development Goals program. Then 2020 happened. The UN pivoted swiftly, blaming the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) for an engineered “covid famine.” So, are they feeding us or starving us?
On one hand, the UN claims to champion global food security. On the other, it appears to flirt with depopulation strategies disguised as environmental sustainability. The industrialized world enjoyed a pandemic-induced staycation, while the world’s impoverished teetered on the brink of starvation.
Sustainable Diets: The UN’s Green Mirage
To tackle this disparity, the UN proposes “sustainable diets” for everyone. These diets supposedly combat climate change, a.k.a. global warming. The UN prioritizes reducing greenhouse gas emissions like carbon dioxide (CO2), which plants need to survive. Their aim? To revert emissions to pre-industrial levels, implying a mass reduction in the human population.
As Rhoda Wilson from The Exposé warns, “Applied to agriculture, it will inevitably lead to a reduction of food diversity, production, and accessibility.” It’s like trading a banquet for a starvation diet.
The Grim Future: Starvation in the Name of Sustainability
The UN’s ambitious sustainability goals could spell doom for up to 132 million people. If successful, their food suppression efforts might starve millions to death in the name of a greener planet.
This September, the UN will convene at the Summit of the Future in New York, where global social engineers will discuss issues like global health, economic development, human rights, and climate change. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), founded in 1945, is at the helm, spending $3.25 billion annually on grand ideas like the Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s, which introduced large-scale chemical agriculture as a world hunger solution.
The Usual Suspects: Who’s Really Behind the FAO?
Backing the FAO are familiar faces like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Global Environment Facility, and the Green Climate Fund. The World Health Organization (WHO) also plays a role in shaping the FAO’s agenda.
The FAO’s “right to food” policy sounds noble until you realize it’s a cover for a climate-driven food agenda. This agenda swaps nutritious, healthy foods for “plant-based,” genetically engineered (GMO), and other Trojan Horse dietary formats. A report warns that the “sustainably healthy diets” partnership between the FAO and WHO aims to reduce CO2 emissions from food production, demonizing meat, fat, dairy, and fish while promoting plant-based protein. It’s a far cry from the diet our bodies evolved to consume.
Depopulation: The Ultimate Green Goal?
The powers that be are hell-bent on depopulation. Will they succeed? With their policies, they might just starve us into a greener future.
About the Author
______________________________________________
🔴 Support Independent Journalism
This work is independently produced without corporate funding.
If you value it, a small donation helps keep it going and supports a senior creator continuing this work.
👉 Support here: I NEED Your Help Today
I think Michelle Obama’s got a d___ https://rumble.com/v59nigj-i-think-michelle-obamas-got-a-d-.html