Unbeknownst to many, a relatively obscure yet influential body called the “Council for Inclusive Capitalism” emerged during the tumultuous times of the COVID-19 pandemic. While it operates under a guise of humanitarian ideals, this group encapsulates what conspiracy theorists have long warned about– a centralized force merging major global corperations and governments, prioritizing ideology over profit.
This council, akin to an Orwellian entity, seeks to corral corporations into a network that champions values of globalism, woke socialism, and climate advocacy. Its mission? To steer corporations toward embracing a far-left political agenda and, subsequently, utilizing their platforms to sway public opinion. We’ve witnessed this strategy unfold through pervasive Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion campaigns in corporate products and media.
Such intense indoctrination has coerced corporations into sacrificing profits for political motives, eroding the principles of a free market. Companies face a stark ultimatum: conform or risk being left behind, crushed under the weight of a socialist bureaucracy. Some may see this as a voluntary shift, perhaps enticed by promises of elevated governance roles in a “Great Reset” scenario.
The survival strategy for these aligned corporations involves cozying up to governments, securing state-backed monopolies, and thriving on perpetual subsidies. Their allegiance to woke ideologies could earn them a “too woke to fail” status, shielding them from public backlash.
This convergence of corporate and government power echoes Mussolini’s concept of fascism– a dangerous blend where the Council for Inclusive Capitalism embodies this authoritarian seed. Led by Lady Lynn de Rothschild, this group has amassed an army of partners, including corporate giants, governments, the UN, and even the Vatican.
Central to their agenda is the exploitation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a tool for global control. AI, hyped as a transformative force, becomes a pretext for centralized authority. The narrative unfolds predictably: problem creation, exaggerated reaction, and then offering their governance as a solution.
Lady Rothschild’s discourse on AI hints at a deliberate agenda to use it as a pretext to reshape economies. The disdain for free markets from these proponents of centralization is evident, contradicting the principles of freedom embedded in free-market systems like Adam Smith’s.
The disparities that serve as justifications for centralization are, in reality, consequences crafted by elites. The Council for Inclusive Capitalism and the Great Reset are mechanisms designed to cement corporate and elitist dominance indefinitely.
They dictate the fate of corporations, societal values, resource allocation, and are shielded by governments from public dissent. Criticizing this this economic invasion labels one a villain opposed to the common good, reinforcing the narrative that the Council is humanity’s savior.
The pertinent question remains: why entrust these elites with determining the common good or overseeing vital decisions? The impending AI-driven governance is touted as an unbiased arbiter, conveniently absolving those in power of accountability.
In this shadowy narrative, AI becomes the omnipotent ruler– a faceless algorithmic authority shielded from rebellion. It’s a perfect guise for a technocratic elite to wield control over the world while evading culpability, using AI as a shield for their descisions.
About the Author
______________________________________________
Help Keep Independent Journalism Alive & Support a Senior
Even a small contribution to my GoFundMe helps me continue this work and get a used car to stay mobile.
