Hungary’s Bold Move: Szijjártó, Budapest, and the Trump-Putin Summit
When I first read that Hungary was volunteering to host a meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, my first thought was: “Wait, seriously?” It sounds like something out of a Cold War-era screenplay — except this time, it’s happening for real, right in the heart of Europe. But that’s exactly what’s unfolding in Budapest, and Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó is right in the middle of it.
Szijjártó has been front and center, declaring that Hungary is not only ready but eager to ensure the full security, logistics, and coordination for a U.S.–Russia summit in Budapest. According to reports from Euronews, Caliber.az, and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Hungary has formally extended its offer to both Washington and Moscow — pitching itself as neutral ground for what could be one of the most significant diplomatic encounters of the decade.
Let’s unpack what this means, and why people are both hopeful and skeptical (sometimes in the same breath).
Setting the Stage: What’s Really Going On
Here’s the short version to get everyone caught up:
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin recently had a phone call, after which Trump publicly announced he plans to meet Putin “within two weeks” in Budapest. The stated goal? To push forward toward some form of peace in Ukraine — or at least, that’s how it’s being framed by Trump’s camp and echoed by the Hungarian government, according to Euronews, the Financial Times, and RFE/RL.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and Szijjártó immediately embraced the idea, promising full cooperation, security support, and, crucially, safe travel arrangements for Putin. Sources like Caliber.az and NAMPA report that Budapest has already begun the diplomatic groundwork.
But here’s the elephant in the room: Putin is under an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for alleged war crimes in Ukraine. And Hungary, technically, is an ICC member — meaning they’d be obligated to arrest him if he entered Hungarian soil. Yet Orbán’s government has already signaled its intention to withdraw from the ICC to sidestep that legal trap, as Radio Free Europe and Euronews both confirmed.
It’s a daring move. Maybe reckless. Definitely unprecedented.
Szijjártó’s Role: The Man Who Says “We’ll Make It Happen”
You’ve got to hand it to Péter Szijjártó — the man doesn’t shy away from geopolitical storms.
He’s been actively working diplomatic backchannels, talking to Russia’s senior advisor Yury Ushakov and U.S. contacts to arrange logistics and protocol, according to NAMPA and RBC Ukraine. Szijjártó even stated that “Putin will be able to enter and leave the country without obstacles” — a statement that turned heads in both Brussels and Washington.
He’s also called Hungary an “island of peace in Europe,” saying the country is uniquely positioned to host this tense summit. Whether that’s idealism or political theater depends on your perspective. But either way, it’s bold.
Why Budapest? Why Now?
It’s fair to ask: why would Trump and Putin choose Hungary of all places?
There are a few logical — and a few political — reasons:
- Symbolic neutrality (sort of): Hungary isn’t directly part of the Ukraine conflict but sits close enough to be seen as “in the neighborhood.” Optically, it’s a neutral setting.
- Political alignment: Let’s be honest — Viktor Orbán has kept friendlier relations with Russia than most EU leaders. According to Reuters and AP News, hosting such a meeting strengthens Hungary’s self-image as an independent mediator.
- Diplomatic leverage: If the summit succeeds (even partially), Hungary wins huge political points on the global stage. If it fails? Well, it still gets noticed.
- Legal loophole: With Hungary’s proposed ICC withdrawal, the government sidesteps the arrest dilemma that would block Putin’s participation.
Meanwhile, the timing couldn’t be more volatile. The war in Ukraine is dragging on. Europe’s energy politics are fracturing. The world’s patience with “endless diplomacy” is running thin. So maybe, just maybe, a summit — even one hosted by Hungary — feels like a necessary gamble.
The Hard Questions (Because There Are Many)
Let’s be real — this whole situation raises more questions than it answers:
- Will it actually achieve anything?
The last Trump–Putin meeting (in Alaska) didn’t produce much beyond photo ops and vague promises. Will this one be any different? Hard to say. - Is Hungary a peace broker or a political opportunist?
Some analysts suggest Orbán and Szijjártó are using this as leverage to boost Hungary’s influence within Europe — and maybe gain some favor with Moscow, too. - Legal chaos ahead:
If Hungary really hosts Putin while under an ICC warrant, it sets a dangerous precedent. How will NATO or the EU react to a member openly defying international law? - Security and optics:
Imagine the logistics — securing two of the most heavily protected leaders on the planet in one city. It’s a security nightmare in the making. - What about Ukraine?
That’s the question hanging over everything. Any “peace summit” without Ukraine at the table risks looking like a show rather than substance.
Real-World Parallels (and a Bit of Perspective)
This isn’t the first time geopolitics has played out in so-called neutral zones. Remember Reykjavik in 1986? Geneva in 1991? Whenever tensions peak, world leaders love the symbolism of meeting somewhere in between — where no one has home-field advantage.
In a strange way, Budapest fits that pattern. It’s “neutral,” yet politically charged enough to matter.
It also reminds me of a story a friend once told me. He worked at a small publishing house that would fly authors to tranquil mountain lodges to “find inspiration.” Sometimes, the location mattered more than the writing itself. Maybe diplomacy works like that too — sometimes, it’s less about the content of the meeting and more about the optics of the moment.
What to Watch Next
A few key signs to look for in the coming days:
- The official date and agenda (so far, “within two weeks” is all we’ve got).
- Preparatory diplomatic leaks — these will hint at real progress.
- The EU and NATO response — whether they endorse, tolerate, or quietly condemn it.
- Hungary’s ICC withdrawal timeline, which could make or break this summit.
- How the media frames it: a step toward peace, or a geopolitical stunt.
Bottom Line (My Two Cents)
Let’s not sugarcoat it — this is a gamble. Szijjártó and Hungary are betting that by positioning themselves as peacemakers, they can punch above their weight on the world stage.
It could work. It could also backfire spectacularly.
Personally, I think the summit will happen. There’s too much momentum, too much political capital already on the line. But whether it brings peace to Ukraine or just another round of headlines — that’s another story entirely.
Either way, Hungary’s move is bold, risky, and undeniably fascinating.
Like what you’re reading?
Help keep this independent voice alive and uncensored.
Buy us a coffee here -> Just Click on ME