In a world where the drama of geopolitics rivals the most gripping soap operas, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has dialed up the intensity with a performance that could only be described as “apocalyptic theater.” His latest proclamation that Ukraine’s crackdown on its largest church is an act of “full-fledged satanism” might just win him an Oscar in the genre of high-stakes melodrama. Let’s dive into this latest episode of international intrigue and see if Medvedev’s script holds up to scrutiny or if it’s just another case of geopolitical grandstanding.
Medvedev’s Divine Outrage: The “Satanic” Plot
According to Medvedev, Ukraine’s recent legislative move against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) is nothing short of a demonic conspiracy. The Ukrainian parliament has passed a law that essentially bans “Russia-linked” religious organizations, a decision Medvedev claims is part of a grand, infernal scheme orchestrated by Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky and his Western allies. Medvedev, who now plays the role of deputy chair of the Russian Security Council, has expressed his profound dissatisfaction with what he describes as a “satanic” assault on religious institutions. Apparently, this latest development is not just a political move but an existential threat to spiritual purity.
The Zelensky Conundrum: No Religious Identity or Just Bad Faith?
Medvedev’s critique of Zelensky goes beyond mere political disagreement. He argues that Zelensky’s alleged lack of religious identity is a personal affront to the very essence of Orthodox Christianity. If Zelensky’s policies were a sin, then according to Medvedev, they would be classified as one of the Seven Deadly Sins. This crusade against the UOC, Medvedev suggests, is a calculated attempt by the “civilized West” to inflict maximum harm on Russia and its faithful citizens. And so, Zelensky’s spiritual void becomes a battleground for Medvedev’s apocalyptic predictions.
From Poroshenko’s Schism to Zelensky’s Purge: A Holy History Lesson
To understand Medvedev’s current fervor, we must journey back to the era of Poroshenko, Zelensky’s predecessor. According to Medvedev, Poroshenko’s creation of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine in 2018 was a colossal blunder, akin to opening Pandora’s box. This schism, allegedly engineered as part of Poroshenko’s reelection strategy, set the stage for the spiritual chaos that Medvedev now denounces. Under Zelensky’s reign, Medvedev claims, this chaos has only intensified, leading to what he characterizes as the “destruction of the Orthodox faith” in Ukraine.
The Prophetic Doom: Ukraine as Sodom and Gomorrah
Medvedev’s rhetoric doesn’t stop at mere allegations; it ventures into the realm of biblical prophecy. He warns that Ukraine is on a trajectory to meet the same grim fate as Sodom and Gomorrah, two cities famously obliterated for their wickedness. With an air of prophetic certainty, Medvedev predicts that “demons will inevitably fall” and Ukraine will face divine retribution for its supposed transgressions. This dramatic narrative is underscored by a reference to the Old Testament’s conquest of Canaan, adding a layer of historical gravitas to his fiery declarations.
Ukrainian Government’s Stance: A Quest for Purity?
Amidst Medvedev’s celestial fury, Ukrainian officials have their own perspective. Viktor Elensky, head of the Ukrainian service for ethnic policy and freedom of conscience, has defended the new law as a necessary measure against what he calls “subversive activities” of the Russian Orthodox Church. Elensky asserts that the law aims to sever any remaining ties with Moscow, not to coerce clerics or believers into other denominations. According to him, if the UOC wishes to continue its existence in Ukraine, it must adhere to these new regulations and publicly disavow its Russian connections.
The UOC’s Resilience: A Test of Faith or Bureaucratic Nonsense?
Clement, the UOC bishop and spokesperson, has responded with a mix of defiance and pragmatism. He questions whether the new regulations will create bureaucratic hurdles for church leaders to prove their loyalty, hinting at the absurdity of having to navigate red tape to maintain spiritual integrity. Clement argues that the UOC will continue to thrive as a legitimate church recognized by Ukrainian believers and independent Orthodox communities worldwide. According to him, any attempts to ban the church will only reflect poorly on those pushing for such measures.
Conclusion: Medvedev’s Cosmic Conspiracy or Political Hyperbole?
As the world watches this unfolding saga, Medvedev’s portrayal of Ukraine’s actions as a satanic crusade might seem like a dramatic flourish in the grand theater of international relations. Whether one views his statements as a profound critique or as an exercise in political hyperbole, the situation in Ukraine remains a hotbed of controversy and contention. Amidst the fiery rhetoric and prophetic warnings, the true implications of this religious and political drama will continue to unfold, leaving audiences to ponder the balance between genuine conflict and theatrical exaggeration.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive. Please Contribute via GoGetFunding
