The story you’ve been fed—the one claiming that COVID shots saved tens of millions of lives—is unraveling. The so-called “cornerstone study,” hailed by media and governments alike as justification for sweeping vaccine mandates, has just been obliterated in a peer-reviewed autopsy.
Published in The Daily Sceptic and reinforced by a chorus of seasoned medical professionals, this scathing review doesn’t mince words. It brands the original paper as “deeply flawed,” “wildly overstated,” and—perhaps most damning of all—built on a foundation of speculative, biased modeling that was never fit for public health policy.
This wasn’t just a mistake. It was a campaign.
Behind the data were institutions with everything to gain—politicians clinging to power, pharmaceutical giants chasing billions, and media outlets feeding the frenzy. What they sold us wasn’t science. It was fear. It was obedience. It was salvation at the end of a syringe—backed by numbers that now crumble under even modest scrutiny.
The consequences? Monumental.
People lost jobs. Families were divided. Lives were upended—all on the back of a narrative that’s now being exposed as more fiction than fact.
The red flags were always there. But they were buried under headlines, drowned out by experts who never dared to dissent, and censored across platforms under the banner of “misinformation.”
Now? The illusion is cracking.
This was never just about a virus. It was about control. About submission. And about what happens when science becomes a weapon, not a guide.
This was never just about a virus. It was about control. About submission. And about what happens when science becomes a weapon, not a guide.