San Francisco Transit Employees Awarded Over $1 Million Each for Vaccine Mandate Violations
In a landmark case, six former Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) employees from San Francisco have each been awarded over $1 million following a court ruling that deemed the COVID-19 vaccine mandate they faced as illegal. These employees, who requested religious exemptions to avoid receiving the COVID vaccine, ultimately lost their jobs when their exemption requests were denied. This case has now set a precedent in protecting individual rights around vaccine mandates.
The Conflict Over Religious Exemptions in San Francisco’s BART System
The BART employees’ requests for religious exemptions were part of a larger wave, with over 100 BART employees seeking similar accommodations. However, according to ABC7 News, the plaintiffs felt their religious beliefs were dismissed, claiming that BART did not take their exemption requests seriously. A lawsuit filed on their behalf argued that the denial of these requests not only disregarded their religious convictions but also violated both the First Amendment and federal anti-discrimination employment laws.
Court Rules BART’s Exemptions Were “Meaningless”
While BART had technically granted “exemptions” for religious objections to the COVID-19 vaccine, the transit authority failed to accommodate these exemptions in practice. Rather than providing options like remote work or regular COVID testing, the plaintiffs were simply terminated. The lawsuit emphasized that meaningful accommodations would have allowed these employees to continue working while honoring their religious beliefs. As it stood, the exemptions were essentially rendered ineffective.
Voices from the Frontlines: Standing Firm on Beliefs
This case brought forward powerful testimonials from employees who, despite their hardships, chose to stand firm in their beliefs. Rhiannon Doyle, one of the former employees, shared her determination with ABC7 reporter J.R. Stone in 2021, stating, “I’m not afraid to be homeless again. They’re tapping into people’s rights, and I’m not going to stand for that, not on my watch.” Another employee, Albert Roth, echoed this sentiment, stressing that he and his colleagues would not back down, despite the risks to their livelihoods.
Jury Finds BART’s Actions Violated Religious Freedom
The crux of this trial rested on whether BART could have reasonably accommodated the plaintiffs without undue hardship to the organization. In a unanimous decision, the jury found that BART had not met this standard and thus had violated the employees’ rights to religious accommodation. The decision ultimately recognized the genuine conflict between the employees’ religious beliefs and the mandate, affirming that their convictions were sincere and worthy of protection.
BART Ordered to Compensate Workers with $7.8 Million in Lost Wages
After a three-year battle, the court awarded a total of $7.8 million to the six former employees, compensating them for lost wages and other hardships. The lead trial attorney, Kevin Snyder, highlighted the courage and conviction of these workers, stating, “The rail employees chose to lose their livelihood rather than deny their faith. This verdict validates their struggle and brings justice to those who felt unheard for so long.”
Key Takeaways from the Historic Verdict
This case has sparked national conversation around the balance between public health mandates and individual rights. While the COVID-19 pandemic forced many organizations to adopt vaccine mandates to ensure workplace safety, this case underscores the importance of honoring personal and religious freedoms within such policies. The verdict sends a clear message: organizations must take exemption requests seriously and ensure that accommodations are meaningful and accessible.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, please consider donating! I’m saving up to buy a used car to keep my travels (and stories) rolling. Every little bit helps — and is deeply appreciated. Thank you for your support! GoGetFunding
