In a recent revelation, a new undercover video from O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) has surfaced, exposing Google’s alleged manipulation of search results in favor of Kamala Harris over Donald Trump. Dakota Leazer, a growth strategist at Google, was caught on tape admitting that the tech giant has been actively shaping its search algorithms and advertisements to push Harris as the preferred candidate for the 2024 presidential election.
This revelation is just the latest in a series of claims about Big Tech’s influence on public perception and the democratic process. Let’s dive into the details of how Google is allegedly rigging search results to serve its own interests.
Google’s Alleged Collusion with Kamala Harris Campaign
The OMG investigation sheds light on a troubling practice: Google is said to be manipulating its search results to present Kamala Harris in a favorable light, while diminishing Donald Trump’s online presence. Dakota Leazer, speaking candidly to one of James O’Keefe’s undercover journalists, revealed that Google has been working closely with the Kamala Harris campaign to ensure that voters are shown content that promotes her candidacy.
This manipulation goes beyond mere search result bias. Leazer indicated that the Kamala Harris campaign has been purchasing fake news headline ads, designed to appear as legitimate news outlets such as CNN and NPR. These ads, in reality, are promotional content for Harris’ campaign disguised as credible journalism.
“Google was essentially promoting through its ads rhetoric that was very pro-Kamala,” Leazer shared in the video. “It seemed like it was an ad from PBS, but it was really an ad for the Kamala campaign.”
This tactic raises serious concerns about transparency and ethical practices within the realm of digital advertising. How many voters are unwittingly consuming biased content without realizing it’s politically motivated?
Fear-Based Content: Google’s Main Revenue Strategy
While Google’s manipulation of search results might seem shocking, it’s all part of a broader strategy to generate ad revenue through fear-based content. Leazer explains that Google isn’t just interested in showing users what they want to see. Instead, the company’s primary goal is to drive clicks, especially through content that incites fear and uncertainty.
According to Leazer, Google’s business model heavily relies on leveraging fear to push users toward content that generates the highest ad revenue. “I think whatever demographic is most fearful is going to be most profitable,” he said. Currently, that demographic appears to be the left, which, according to Leazer, is more susceptible to fear-based messaging.
This tactic isn’t unique to Google. Other media giants like CNN have also been accused of using fear-driven programming to boost their profits. Charlie Chester, CNN’s technical director, openly admitted in a previous undercover video that “fear sells,” and it’s a strategy many major media outlets use to keep viewers engaged.
The Fallout: Leazer’s Scrub of Social Media
Since the release of the undercover video, Dakota Leazer has taken swift action to erase his digital footprint. He removed all his TikTok videos, including those featuring him in Google-branded merchandise, and scrubbed his bio and contact details from the web.
James O’Keefe, the founder of OMG, tweeted about the fallout, noting that Leazer’s attempts to hide come after being caught admitting Google’s manipulation of search engine ads.
Meanwhile, the story has ignited fierce debate online, with many calling out Google’s role in shaping political discourse. One notable comment from the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) came from user “Truth Justice,” who wrote, “Kamala Harris is controlled by corrupt billionaires like Soros and Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO,” underscoring the belief that Big Tech is handpicking political leaders to further its own financial interests.
Big Tech’s Growing Power in Elections
Google’s alleged interference in the 2024 election is part of a larger pattern of Big Tech companies exerting influence over political outcomes. Whether it’s through manipulating search algorithms or controlling the flow of information on platforms like YouTube and Facebook, these tech giants hold immense power over what voters see and believe.
The most concerning aspect of this manipulation is that it’s happening behind the scenes, largely out of sight for the average user. Most people rely on Google to provide unbiased, accurate search results, not realizing that the content they’re being fed could be part of a larger agenda.
As Leazer mentioned in the undercover video, it’s all about the money. Google’s ultimate goal is to maintain its stock price and keep its investors happy, and if that means favoring one political side over the other, then so be it. “I think Google has a belief that one side will allow them to make more money,” Leazer said.
What’s Next for Google and the 2024 Election?
As we move closer to the 2024 election, the debate over Big Tech’s role in shaping political outcomes will only intensify. Will companies like Google be held accountable for their alleged manipulation of information? Or will they continue to operate in the shadows, quietly swaying public opinion with their immense power?
For voters, it’s a wake-up call to stay informed and vigilant. The content we see online isn’t always neutral or objective, and understanding how algorithms and political campaigns work together is crucial for making informed decisions.
One thing is clear: Big Tech’s influence on politics isn’t going away anytime soon, and the implications for democracy are profound.
In a digital age where information is king, we must question the sources and motivations behind what we consume. As allegations of manipulation swirl around companies like Google, the need for transparency and accountability has never been greater.
Free Speech and Alternative Media are under attack by the Deep State. We need your support to survive. Please Contribute via GoGetFunding